TechHui

Hawaii's Science, Technology and New Media Community

I've been toying with the idea of using stock photos on my website but it always bothered me that their smiles looked plastic. Its fake to use models to represent your company when they don't actually work for you.

This webpage hilariously (and often rudely) mocks the use of stock photography on corporate websites:
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=stock_photos

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Its fake to use models to represent your company when they don't actually work for you.

This is why you should always use lemurs on your corporate site. Lemurs never flash fake smiles and are always sincere (in their quest for tasty nuts and grubs.)

Reply to This

Reply to This

Hey Truman,

I think the simple solution is to make fake people to go with the fake smiles like the picture attached to this post.

Making three dimensional faux people will get around Daniel's suggestion that it is fake to use people that do not work for you (to represent your company). These fake people do work for you and you can pay them under the table. As a matter of fact, they never take a day off, call in sick, or complain. You, as their boss, can make them do things a real person would, or could, ever do.

Each faux person, since they are genuine cad files, can be grown on rapid prototyping machines, and the facial expressions can fit the way you do business.

Bottom line? Stock photos are out when you can have computer aided renderings instead.

I hope you guys understand this post is tongue in cheek...
Attachments:

Reply to This

I wouldn't worry. Do you think that people in advertisements for Walmart or "what-ever-store-on-the-face-of-this-planet" are working from them? Well except for the purpose of the advertisement?

If so that would mean that Kelloggs employ 5 years olds in the midwest, and it would make Jack in the box hire people with insanely big heads made out of plastic. But hey I am am all for equal opportunity employers...

The point is that if you take their picture and make it seem like they work for you..like portrait or some random person, then call her Jenny, 35, PhD in Astrophysics, does our CSS etc, then it is disingenuous...otherwise your worst problem would be:

1. Potential clients recognize the pic from a lot of websites,
2. Having a pics of person / people is often sign of a small company that tries hard to make an impression of being bigger than they are
3. The model, Jenny, 35 used in the stock photo goes on a killing rampage and has her picture spread all over and your clients sees her, and recognizes her from your site...

Otherwise no problem. Few people are willing to pay out for custom pics and models professionally done.

Reply to This

I think that your post has altered the way that I view these stock photos permanently. For instance, when I see this ad, I can't help but imagine that the guy was so stoned that he forgot to brush his hair.

Reply to This

Reply to This

RSS

Sponsors


web design, web development, localization

© 2009   Created by Daniel Leuck

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service